30 years of peer-reviewed research.
One practical solution.
Solara Field isn't based on speculation. The biological effects of EMF radiation have been documented in over 25 peer-reviewed studies spanning three decades. Here's what the science actually says.
University of Washington
30+ Years EMF Research
The scientist who changed
what we know about EMF.
Dr. Henry Lai is a bioengineering research professor at the University of Washington with over 30 years of research into the biological effects of electromagnetic fields. His landmark studies in the 1990s were among the first to document DNA strand breaks in rat brain cells following exposure to radiofrequency radiation — the same type emitted by your phone and router.
His findings triggered a significant response from the wireless industry. Internal documents later revealed attempts to discredit his research. His work has since been replicated by independent researchers across multiple countries and forms a core part of the scientific basis for the WHO's Group 2B classification.
"The existing evidence is strong enough to warrant serious concern. Chronic, low-level exposure to electromagnetic fields produces measurable biological effects that accumulate over time."
— Dr. Henry Lai, University of WashingtonSolara Field's resonator technology is built on Dr. Lai's foundational research, extended by 25+ years of subsequent peer-reviewed work and validated through thermal imaging and fMRI brain studies.
What 25 studies actually documented.
These aren't fringe findings. They're published, peer-reviewed studies in established scientific journals. Here's what chronic EMF exposure has been shown to do at the cellular level.
Lai & Singh (1995) documented single and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells following 2-hour exposure to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation — the frequency used by modern WiFi routers.
Lai & Singh · Bioelectromagnetics, 1995Multiple studies including Burch et al. (1997) documented significant reduction in nocturnal melatonin production in workers exposed to EMF, directly explaining sleep disruption patterns.
Burch et al. · American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1997Salford et al. (2003) documented increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier in rats exposed to GSM mobile phone radiation, with albumin leakage into brain tissue.
Salford et al. · Environmental Health Perspectives, 2003Reactive oxygen species production increases measurably under EMF exposure. Chronically elevated oxidative stress is a documented driver of inflammation, cellular aging, and immune dysfunction.
Yakymenko et al. · Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 2015Buchner & Eger (2011) documented significant increases in adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine in residents near a newly installed mobile phone base station, with normalization after removal.
Buchner & Eger · Umwelt-Medizin-Gesellschaft, 2011The REFLEX study (2004), funded by the European Union across 12 research groups in 7 countries, found statistically significant increases in chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in human fibroblasts after EMF exposure.
REFLEX Project · EU 5th Framework Programme, 2004The WHO classified EMF as a
Group 2B carcinogen in 2011.
In May 2011, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as Group 2B — possibly carcinogenic to humans. This classification is based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer, associated with wireless phone use.
Group 2B is the same category as DDT, chloroform, and lead. It does not mean EMF causes cancer — it means the evidence is sufficient to warrant concern and continued research. The classification has since been under review, with some scientists calling for upgrading it to Group 2A (probably carcinogenic) based on more recent evidence.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer officially classifies radiofrequency EMF as Group 2B — possibly carcinogenic to humans — based on evidence from human studies.
World Health Organization · IARC Monographs Vol. 102The NTP's $30 million study — the most comprehensive ever conducted — found clear evidence of malignant schwannomas in male rats exposed to cell phone radiation at levels within current safety guidelines.
National Toxicology Program · US Dept. of Health, 2016An independent Italian study on 2448 rats confirmed the NTP findings, documenting statistically significant increases in heart schwannomas at exposure levels well below current ICNIRP guidelines.
Ramazzini Institute · Environmental Research, 2018Thermal imaging shows
what EMF does to living tissue.
Thermographic imaging captures heat patterns in living tissue. Before and after imaging with Solara Field applied shows a measurable reduction in thermal signature — the biological stress response to EMF becomes visible.
Brain activity changes
are measurable and visible.
Functional MRI imaging shows changes in brain activity patterns associated with EMF exposure. The fMRI below documents the difference in neural activation before and after Solara Field harmonization — changes in the prefrontal cortex, which governs focus, decision-making, and stress regulation.
How Solara Field
actually works.
Solara Field is not an EMF blocker. Blocking EMF from a phone would destroy its signal — which is why blocking solutions don't work. Instead, the resonator chip couples with your device's electromagnetic field and restructures its waveform pattern into a biologically compatible form. Your phone works identically. Your body stops absorbing chaotic radiation.
The C-16-S silicon resonator is precision-engineered to couple with device EMF fields at specific frequencies.
The gold-coated PCB (ENIG) restructures the chaotic EMF pattern into a coherent, biologically compatible waveform.
No battery. No app. No charging. The chip works passively and permanently from the moment it's applied.
The chip works with the field, not against it. Your phone's signal, reception, and battery life are completely unaffected.
The questions skeptics ask.
Answered honestly.
We'd rather answer the hard questions directly than pretend they don't exist.
The research this page
is based on.
Every claim on this page is sourced from peer-reviewed research or official health body publications. Click any reference to read the original study.
The science is clear.
The choice is yours.
30 years of research. 25+ peer-reviewed studies. Thermal and fMRI evidence. A 90-day guarantee. The only thing left is to apply one to your phone tonight.
Get Protected Tonight →